He even works for the newspaper (The Daily Acorn) in See What Develops. He is largely based off Superman he can fly, shoot laser beams from his eyes, has super strength, super speed, supersonic hearing, super durability, can turn back time, and can breathe ice. “Do you really want to set parking fees on 11 different campuses?” he said.Splendid is a aqua blue superhero flying squirrel with light-blue patagium (gliding wings), a light-blue/white oval marking on his torso, and a red mask around his head. He asked lawmakers to at least amend the bill to allow campuses to set their own fees. John Richman, president of the North Dakota State College of Science, echoed Skogen’s sentiment that the bill could limit student input into the process of setting tuition and fees. A funding model approved by lawmakers in 2013 is tied to completion of credit hours, allowing the system to show lawmakers what the range of tuition increases will be based on their appropriation, he said. The Legislature already drives tuition rates in a sense, Skogen said. He also noted in-state tuition and fees have increased at a rate below the national average since 2009. Skogen said technology has driven up the cost of higher education more than any other factor. NDSU’s in-state tuition rate has jumped by nearly 66 percent in the last decade, from $3,982 in 2004-05 to $6,604 this school year. Ben Koppelman, a committee member and Republican from West Fargo, said the bill is not so much a legislative attempt to hold power as it is a way to control the overall cost of higher education, which “has increased exponentially compared to inflation.” Skogen said tuition rates are currently set by legislative bodies in five states: California, Louisiana, Ohio, Florida and Washington. The Legislature’s Budget Section set non-resident tuition for a time until lawmakers repealed a law in 1999 and restored that authority to the board. The Board of Higher Education, and prior to its creation in 1939 the Board of Regents, have set tuition at the state’s campuses since 1913. “The frustration of a tuition increase four years ago should not, I believe, obviate the good business practice of having the governing board set those rates,” he said. Larry Skogen, interim chancellor of the North Dakota University System, pointed out Wednesday that NDSU didn’t hike tuition the following year, and if spread out over two years it would have been a 4.4 percent increase. NDSU President Dean Bresciani defended the tuition hike at the time, saying it was needed to prevent cuts to core programs and that it wasn’t until the end of the session that lawmakers reduced the amount of equity funding, disproportionately affecting In one example that especially rankled lawmakers, Dosch recalled North Dakota State University’s 8.8 percent tuition increase approved by the board in May 2011, just days after lawmakers adjourned after being assured campuses wouldn’t hike tuition more than 2.5 percent. We try to steer the car in the directions that we want, but someone else has their foot on the accelerator, and this ultimately ends very bad,” said Dosch, R-Bismarck. “It’s kind of like driving a car down the road. Mark Dosch, a bill co-sponsor and member of the House Appropriations Committee that has been hearing budget requests from campuses this week, said it’s frustrating that lawmakers don’t control tuition rates, “the most important aspect of the budgeting process.” The proposed change in state law would permit the board to charge tuition and fees “in the amounts established by the legislative assembly.”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |